ععربي
  • Worldwide Analyses of Maxillary First Molar Second Mesiobuccal Prevalence
    Worldwide Analyses of Maxillary First Molar Second Mesiobuccal Prevalence: A Multicenter Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Study
    Jorge N.R. Martins, DDS, MSc
    Moataz-Bellah A.M. Alkhawas, DDS, MSc
    Zaher Altaki, DDS, MSc
    Gianmarco Bellardini, DDS
    Luiza Berti, DDS, MSc
    Carlos Boveda, DDS
    Antonis Chaniotis, DDS, MSc
    Daniel Flynn, BDS
    Jose Antonio Gonzalez, DDS, MSc, PhD
    Jojo Kottoor, BDS, MDS
    Miguel Seruca Marques, DDS
    Adam Monroe, DMD
    Hani F. Ounsi, DCD, DESE, PhD, FICD
    Peter Parashos, BDS, MDSc, PhD
    Gianluca Plotino, DDS, PhD
    Magnús F. Ragnarsson, DDS
    Ruben Rosas Aguilar, DDS
    Fábio Santiago, DDS, MSc
    Hussein C. Seedat, BDS, MSc
    Walter Vargas, DDS, MSc
    Murilo von Zuben, DDS, MSc
    Yuerong Zhang, DDS, MSc
    Yongchun Gu, DDS, PhD
    António Ginjeira, DDS, PhD
    Show less
    Published:September 19, 2018

    Abstract
    Introduction
    Maxillary first molar second mesiobuccal (MB2) root canal prevalence may change among different populations. The aim of this study was to analyze the worldwide prevalence of the MB2 root canal and understand its possible relation with sex, age, side, and root configuration using in vivo cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) assessment.
    Methods
    Observers from 21 regions were calibrated to achieve a similar CBCT assessment methodology and instructed to collect data from 250 maxillary first molars in previously existing examinations. Intra- and interrater reliability tests were performed. The sample size included 5250 molars and was defined by way of a preliminary trial. Data collected included MB2 presence, sex, age, side, number of roots per tooth, and mesiobuccal root configuration. The z test for proportions in independent groups was used to analyze the differences among subgroups. P < .05 was considered significant.
    Results
    The worldwide CBCT-assessed MB2 prevalence was 73.8%, ranging from 48.0% in Venezuela to 97.6% in Belgium. The prevalence in males and females was 76.3% and 71.8%, respectively ( P < .05). Significantly higher MB2 proportions were found in younger patients and 3-rooted molar configurations. The group intraclass correlation coefficient and the percentage of agreement for the MB2 presence were 0.95 and 0.91, respectively. The intrarater Cohen kappa value was above 0.61 for all observers.
    Conclusions
    MB2 prevalence in the analyzed regions varied widely. The differences may be associated with specificities within each region but also patient demographics. Males, younger patients, and 3-rooted configurations were associated with higher MB2 proportions.

    References
    1.
    o Karabucak B.
    o Bunes A.
    o Chehoud C.
    o et al.
    Prevalence of apical periodontitis in endodontically treated premolars and molars with untreated canal: a cone-beam computed tomography study.
    J Endod. 2016; 42: 538-541
    View in Article
    o Scopus (59)
    o PubMed
    o Abstract
    o Full Text
    o Full Text PDF
    o Google Scholar
    2.
    o Wolcott J.
    o Ishley D.
    o Kennedy W.
    o et al.
    A 5 yr clinical investigation of second mesiobuccal canals in endodontically treated and retreated maxillary molars.
    J Endod. 2005; 31: 262-264
    View in Article
    o Scopus (77)
    o PubMed
    o Abstract
    o Full Text
    o Full Text PDF
    o Google Scholar
    3.
    o Jing Y.N.
    o Ye X.
    o Liu D.G.
    o et al.
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao. 2014; 46: 958-962
    View in Article
    o PubMed
    o Google Scholar
    4.
    o Naseri M.
    o Safi Y.
    o Akbarzadeh Baghban A.
    o et al.
    Survey of anatomy and root canal morphology of maxillary first molars regarding age and gender in an Iranian population using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Iran Endod J. 2016; 11: 298-303
    View in Article
    o PubMed
    o Google Scholar
    5.
    o Silva E.J.
    o Nejaim Y.
    o Silva A.I.
    o et al.
    Evaluation of root canal configuration of maxillary molars in a Brazilian population using cone-beam computed tomographic imaging: an in vivo study.
    J Endod. 2014; 40: 173-176
    View in Article
    o Scopus (74)
    o PubMed
    o Abstract
    o Full Text
    o Full Text PDF
    o Google Scholar
    6.
    o Kim Y.
    o Lee S.J.
    o Woo J.
    Morphology of maxillary first and second molars analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography in a korean population: variations in the number of roots and canals and the incidence of fusion.
    J Endod. 2012; 38: 1063-1068
    View in Article
    o Scopus (127)
    o PubMed
    o Abstract
    o Full Text
    o Full Text PDF
    o Google Scholar
    7.
    o Martins J.N.
    o Marques D.
    o Mata A.
    o Carames J.
    Root and root canal morphology of the permanent dentition in a Caucasian population: a cone-beam computed tomography study.
    Int Endod J. 2017; 50: 1013-1026
    View in Article
    o Scopus (43)
    o PubMed
    o Crossref
    o Google Scholar
    8.
    o Torres A.
    o Jacobs R.
    o Lambrechts P.
    o et al.
    Characterization of mandibular molar root and canal morphology using cone beam computed tomography and its variability in Belgian and Chilean population samples.
    Imaging Sci Dent. 2015; 45: 95-101
    View in Article
    o Scopus (26)
    o PubMed
    o Crossref
    o Google Scholar
    9.
    o von Zuben M.
    o Martins J.N.
    o Berti L.
    o et al.
    Worldwide prevalence of mandibular second molar C-shaped morphologies evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography.
    J Endod. 2017; 43: 1442-1447
    View in Article
    o Scopus (24)
    o PubMed
    o Abstract
    o Full Text
    o Full Text PDF
    o Google Scholar
    10.
    o Martins J.N.R.
    o Marques D.
    o Francisco H.
    o Carames J.
    Gender influence on the number of roots and root canal system configuration in human permanent teeth of a Portuguese subpopulation.
    Quintessence Int. 2018; 49: 103-111
    View in Article
    o PubMed
    o Google Scholar
    11.
    o Martins J.N.
    o Ordinola-Zapata R.
    o Marques D.
    o et al.
    Differences in root canal system configuration in human permanent teeth within different age groups.
    Int Endod J. 2018; 51: 931-941
    View in Article
    o Scopus (19)
    o PubMed
    o Crossref
    o Google Scholar
    12.
    o Zhang Q.
    o Chen H.
    o Fan B.
    o et al.
    Root and root canal morphologies in maxillary second molar with fused root from a native Chinese population.
    J Endod. 2014; 40: 871-885
    View in Article
    o Scopus (29)
    o PubMed
    o Abstract
    o Full Text
    o Full Text PDF
    o Google Scholar
    13.
    o Scott G.R.
    o Turner C.G.
    The Anthropology of Modern Human Teeth: Dental Morphology and Its Variation in Recent Human Populations.
    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, NY1997
    View in Article
    o Scopus (15)
    o Crossref
    o Google Scholar
    14.
    o Guo J.
    o Vahidnia A.
    o Sedghizadeh P.
    o Enciso R.
    Evaluation of root and canal morphology of maxillary permanent first molars in a North American population by cone-beam computed tomography.
    J Endod. 2014; 40: 635-639
    View in Article
    o Scopus (43)
    o PubMed
    o Abstract
    o Full Text
    o Full Text PDF
    o Google Scholar
    15.
    o Nikoloudaki G.E.
    o Kontogiannis T.G.
    o Kerezoudis N.P.
    Evaluation of the root and canal morphology of maxillary permanent molars and the incidence of the second mesiobuccal root canal in Greek population using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Open Dent J. 2015; 9: 267-272
    View in Article
    o Scopus (17)
    o PubMed
    o Crossref
    o Google Scholar
    16.
    o Slowey R.R.
    Radiographic aids in the detection of extra root canals.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1974; 37: 762-772
    View in Article
    o Scopus (110)
    o PubMed
    o Abstract
    o Full Text PDF
    o Google Scholar
    17.
    o Lee J.H.
    o Kim K.D.
    o Lee J.K.
    o et al.
    Mesiobuccal root canal anatomy of Korean maxillary first and second molars by cone-beam computed tomography.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001; 111: 785-791
    View in Article
    o Scopus (82)
    o Abstract
    o Full Text
    o Full Text PDF
    o Google Scholar
    18.
    o Vertucci F.J.
    Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984; 58: 589-599
    View in Article
    o Scopus (870)
    o PubMed
    o Abstract
    o Full Text PDF
    o Google Scholar
    19.
    o Somma F.
    o Leoni D.
    o Plotino G.
    o et al.
    Root canal morphology of the mesiobuccal root of maxillary first molars: a micro-computed tomography analysis.
    Int Endod J. 2009; 42: 165-174
    View in Article
    o Scopus (74)
    o PubMed
    o Crossref
    o Google Scholar
    20.
    o Verma P.
    o Love R.M.
    A micro CT study of the mesiobuccal root canal morphology of the maxillary first molar tooth.
    Int Endod J. 2011; 44: 210-217
    View in Article
    o Scopus (81)
    o PubMed
    o Crossref
    o Google Scholar
    21.
    o ElAyouti A.
    o Hulber J.M.
    o Judenhofer M.S.
    o et al.
    Apical constriction: location and dimensions in molars-a micro-computed tomography study.
    J Endod. 2014; 40: 1095-1099
    View in Article
    o Scopus (33)
    o PubMed
    o Abstract
    o Full Text
    o Full Text PDF
    o Google Scholar
    22.
    o Park J.W.
    o Lee J.K.
    o Ha B.H.
    o et al.
    Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary first molar mesiobuccal root canal configuration and curvature using micro-computed tomography.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 108: 437-442
    View in Article
    o Scopus (41)
    o PubMed
    o Abstract
    o Full Text
    o Full Text PDF
    o Google Scholar
    23.
    o Reis A.G.
    o Grazziotin-Soares R.
    o Barletta F.B.
    o et al.
    Second canal in mesiobuccal root of maxillary molars is correlated with root third and patient age: a cone-beam computed tomographic study.
    J Endod. 2013; 39: 588-592
    View in Article
    o Scopus (48)
    o PubMed
    o Abstract
    o Full Text
    o Full Text PDF
    o Google Scholar
    24.
    o Abuabara A.
    o Baratto-Filho F.
    o Aguiar Anele J.
    o et al.
    Efficacy of clinical and radiological methods to identify second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first molars.
    Acta Odontol Scand. 2013; 71: 205-209
    View in Article
    o Scopus (24)
    o PubMed
    o Crossref
    o Google Scholar
    25.
    o Falcão C.A.
    o Albuquerque V.C.
    o Amorim N.L.
    o et al.
    Frequency of the mesiopalatal canal in upper first permanent molars viewed through computed tomography.
    Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2016; 29: 54-59
    View in Article
    o PubMed
    o Google Scholar
    26.
    o Lyra C.M.
    o Delai D.
    o Pereira K.C.
    o et al.
    Morphology of mesiobuccal root canals of maxillary first molars: a comparison of CBCT scanning and cross-sectioning.
    Braz Dent J. 2015; 26: 525-529
    View in Article
    o Scopus (10)
    o PubMed
    o Crossref
    o Google Scholar
    27.
    o Plotino G.
    o Tocci L.
    o Grande N.M.
    o et al.
    Symmetry of root and root canal morphology of maxillary and mandibular molars in a white population: a cone-beam computed tomography study in vivo.
    J Endod. 2013; 39: 1545-1548
    View in Article
    o Scopus (63)
    o PubMed
    o Abstract
    o Full Text
    o Full Text PDF
    o Google Scholar
    28.
    o Tian X.M.
    o Yang X.W.
    o Qian L.
    o et al.
    Analysis of the root and canal morphologies in maxillary first and second molars in a Chinese population using cone-beam computed tomography.
    J Endod. 2016; 42: 696-701
    View in Article
    o Scopus (31)
    o PubMed
    o Abstract
    o Full Text
    o Full Text PDF
    o Google Scholar
    29.
    o Zhang R.
    o Yang H.
    o Yu X.
    o et al.
    Use of CBCT to identify the morphology of maxillary permanent molar teeth in a Chinese subpopulation.
    Int Endod J. 2011; 44: 162-169
    View in Article
    o Scopus (118)
    o PubMed
    o Crossref
    o Google Scholar
    30.
    o Zhang Y.
    o Xu H.
    o Wang D.
    o et al.
    Assessment of the second mesiobuccal root canal in maxillary first molars: a cone-beam computed tomographic study.
    J Endod. 2017; 43: 1990-1996
    View in Article
    o Scopus (15)
    o PubMed
    o Abstract
    o Full Text
    o Full Text PDF
    o Google Scholar
    31.
    o Zheng Q.H.
    o Wang Y.
    o Zhou X.D.
    o et al.
    A cone-beam computed tomography study of maxillary first permanent molar root and canal morphology in a Chinese population.
    J Endod. 2010; 36: 1480-1484
    View in Article
    o Scopus (108)
    o PubMed
    o Abstract
    o Full Text
    o Full Text PDF
    o Google Scholar
    32.
    o Perez-Heredia M.
    o Ferrer-Luque C.M.
    o Bravo M.
    o et al.
    Cone-beam computed tomographic study of root anatomy and canal configuration of molars in a Spanish population.
    J Endod. 2017; 43: 1511-1516
    View in Article
    o Scopus (19)
    o PubMed
    o Abstract
    o Full Text
    o Full Text PDF
    o Google Scholar
    33.
    o Ghobashy A.M.
    o Nagy M.M.
    o Bayoumi A.A.
    Evaluation of root and canal morphology of maxillary permanent molars in an Egyptian population by cone-beam computed tomography.
    J Endod. 2017; 43: 1089-1092
    View in Article
    o Scopus (24)
    o PubMed
    o Abstract
    o Full Text
    o Full Text PDF
    o Google Scholar
    34.
    o Vizzotto M.B.
    o Silveira P.F.
    o Arús N.A.
    o et al.
    CBCT for assessment of second mesiobuccal (MB2) canals in maxillary molar teeth: effect of voxel size and presence of rot filling.
    Int Endod J. 2013; 46: 870-876
    View in Article
    o Scopus (56)
    o PubMed
    o Crossref
    o Google Scholar
    35.
    o Burklein S.
    o Heck R.
    o Schafer E.
    Evaluation of the root canal anatomy of maxillary and mandibular premolars in a selected German population using cone-beam computed tomographic data.
    J Endod. 2017; 43: 1448-1452
    View in Article
    o Scopus (28)
    o PubMed
    o Abstract
    o Full Text
    o Full Text PDF
    o Google Scholar
    36.
    o Arslan H.
    o Capar I.D.
    o Ertas E.T.
    o et al.
    A cone-beam computed tomographic study of root canal systems in mandibular premolars in a Turkish population: Theoretical model for determining orifice shape.
    Eur J Dent. 2015; 9: 11-19
    View in Article
    o Scopus (15)
    o PubMed
    o Crossref
    o Google Scholar
    37.
    o Felsypremila G.
    o Vinothkumar T.S.
    o Kandaswamy D.
    Anatomic symmetry of root and root canal morphology of posterior teeth in Indian subpopulation using cone beam computed tomography: a retrospective study.
    Eur J Dent. 2015; 9: 500-507
    View in Article
    o Scopus (20)
    o PubMed
    o Crossref
    o Google Scholar
    38.
    o Tian Y.Y.
    o Guo B.
    o Zhang R.
    o et al.
    Root and canal morphology of maxillary first premolars in a Chinese subpopulation evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Int Endod J. 2012; 45: 996-1003
    View in Article
    o Scopus (47)
    o PubMed
    o Crossref
    o Google Scholar
    39.
    o Betancourt P.
    o Navarro P.
    o Munoz G.
    o Fuentes R.
    Prevalence and location of the secondary mesiobuccal canal in 1,100 maxillary molars using cone beam computed tomography.
    BMC Med Imaging. 2016; 16: 66
    View in Article
    o Scopus (25)
    o PubMed
    o Crossref
    o Google Scholar
    40.
    o Thomas R.
    o Moule A.
    o Bryant R.
    Root canal morphology of maxillary permanent first molar teeth at various ages.
    Int Endod J. 1993; 26: 257-267
    View in Article
    o Scopus (85)
    o PubMed
    o Crossref
    o Google Scholar
    Article Info
    Publication History
    Published online: September 19, 2018
    Identification
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.07.027
    Copyright
    © 2018 American Association of Endodontists.

    Copyright © 2020 Dr. Moataz Alkhawas All rights reserved